Branding Strategies: New Skittles Marketing: Successful Branding Strategy?
The internet marketing industry has been full of chatter about Skittles’ new internet marketing campaign. Skittles tried an interesting new approach to online marketing and social media when they launched their new company website, on a wikipedia portal, featuring a live Twitter feed alongside Facebook, Flickr, and YouTube content. BusinessWeek continues, “Instead of the usual corporate propaganda, the home page and “chatter” section became the brand’s Twitter page, the video media and images pages became the brand’s YouTube page and Flickr stream, respectively. Meanwhile, the “friends” section morphed into a Skittles Facebook fan page. According to Andy Hobsbawm, European chairman of online ad firm agency.com , which came up with the idea, the site received so many hits the first day it brought down Twitter.”
Sounds innovative, right? It may have been, and I applaud Skittles for their creativity, but the brand has had to battle some tough issues since the site’s launch on March 2nd. The biggest issue that Skittles has been facing is having users bombard the site with inane and often profane “tweets.” When the site launched, the Twitter feed was at first prominently displayed as the home page, now, due to the abuse, the twiter feed is now harder to find—just a small link in the corner of the screen.
In my opinion, I appreciate that Skittles really stepped outside of the box to market themselves online, but I find myself asking, where is the REAL value? I am a woman in my late twenties, what is the value to me (obviously aside from sparking conversation in my industry). I find the “connection” value dangerously low for the Skittles team, and wonder about the ROI calculated at the beginning of the campaign, after all, how many people are going to run out to the store and buy skittles, because they are a FB Skittles Fan?
I would also like to hear from Mars (owner of Skittles brand) on their goals behind the campaign. Maybe it was simply a publicity stunt to get people talking about their brand. It worked, didn’t it?
Online & social media marketers seem to be torn as to the success of Skittle’s new online strategy. I gathered some opinions below, and I look forward to you adding yours to a comment!
“Agency.com got a bunch of marketing and social media wonks (yours truly included) to talk about Skittles. If that was the goal of the work, mission accomplished. But if the goal was to genuinely connect Skittles more closely to their community, stunts don’t cut it.” – Bart Vickers from VML
“I’ve heard nothing about Skittles and Twits outside of my reading of marketing and advertising publications. Nothing on the news. Nothing in the paper. Nobody I know talking about it (and I teach at a city college infested with young people). The only people this appears to have affected at all are those already connected to advertising, social media, or rampant Skittles fans. That means its major effect has been on people in the industry, people who obsessively browse Twitter for something to follow, and people who already consume Twitters. A good ad campaign would have produced far greater effects. Yes, it would have been more expensive, but it would have actually accomplished something.” – Holman Tibbett from Ad Nauseam
“I think people are missing the point here. The Twitter feed was a short-term stunt — designed to get us all talking. And now they’ve made the switch to Facebook at the perfect time — while we were all still paying attention. If they had waited more than another day, this buzz would have been over. Instead, they get an entire second news cycle out of this. And that translates to new “friends” on their Facebook page, which is monetizeable in a very real way.” – Zach Goodwin from ZBGoodwin
“With everything that is going on in our world- you would think that Skittles and their agency would be more sensitive to what PEOPLE REALLY CARE ABOUT…(sorry, it’s NOT Skittles)….I realize they have a product to market, but if current examples in the world don’t make it obvious that you need to exert a LOT of sensitivity in your marketing messages (offer SOLUTIONS, not HYPE), I’m not sure what you need to know to wake up and be MORE IN TOUCH with your audience. They got trashed on Twitter because Twitters are about REAL, organic, testimonials and truth in real time. Spending the time, and $$$ with an agency that didn’t understand nor grasp that from the get go, shows that someone at the top of this, should have done more homework, or solicited better advice about using Twitter. Every agency in the world wants to jump on the bandwagon and utilize Social Media. If you don’t understand how to properly “engage” consumers using Web 2.0 technology, you need to be careful, for it’ll blow up it you face.” – Greg Lee from IMAGINE NATION
“The closest thing I can equate this to is the increases in search for Rihanna and Chris Brown being a good thing. Ask yourself, who are the people who eat the most skittles? 18 and up? I think people are being praised for poor execution, this could have been done in a much much better way. And I am pretty sure the FB fan increase is mostly a viral thing on facebook, i didn’t fan the skittles page on the website, i saw it as the network of social peeps started becoming Fans as i am sure most did, so the dumb luck of the Facebook after effects are the good part of this you are right.. then again so is the example of what NOT to do in social media or to Rihanna if you are Chris Brown.” – steve plunkett from M/C/C
“I’ve said this umpteen times by now, but I think the real value is less about the execution and more about the philosophy that drove it. If it means anything at all, it’s that this campaign is a recognition of the importance of the role social media plays in brand-building. The game has changed. It’s not 1999 anymore.” – Paul Chaney from Bizzuka Inc.